Yushchenko-Yanukovych Alliance
January 15, 2010 – 7:07 amYushchenko and Yanukovych Forge an Electoral Alliance
President Viktor Yushchenko (L) and Party of Regions leader Yanukovych
On December 25, 2009 UNIAN published a secret agreement “On Political Reconciliation and the Development of Ukraine” leaked by Yaroslav Kozachok, the deputy head of the presidential secretariat’s department on domestic affairs and regional development. Kozachok resigned in protest at the secret agreement between President Viktor Yushchenko and Party of Regions leader Viktor Yanukovych to appoint the former as Prime Minister in the event of Yanukovych’s election.
The Yushchenko and Yanukovych campaigns –not surprisingly– alleged that the document was a forgery (Ukrayinska Pravda, December 28). At the same time, its authenticity is proven by two steps undertaken by the presidential secretariat. Firstly, the presidential secretariat’s pressure on television channels not to discuss the document, which led to Kozachok complaining about the return of censorship to Ukrainian media. “It is obvious that ignoring (the document) has taken place on instructions from ‘above,’ and the system has worked to block the appearance in the mass media of information unpleasant for senior officials” (Ukrayinska Pravda, December 29).
This would not be the first occasion when direct intervention halted revelations about a secret electoral alliance between Yushchenko-Yanukovych. In December the Security Service (SBU) was instructed by the president to investigate the appearance of large billboards throughout Kyiv and other cities that had reproduced the front cover of the December 4 edition of the weekly magazine Komentarii with the headline “Yushchenko has negotiated the seat of premier.” The billboards, which showed Yushchenko and Yanukovych embracing in a pose reminiscent of the Soviet and East German leaders Leonid Brezhnev and Erich Honecker, were ordered to be taken down. The Ukrainian media complained of “censorship.”
Secondly, if the document unveiled by Kozachok was indeed a “forgery” then why did the president order the prosecutor-general to launch an investigation into the publication of a “state secret?” Yushchenko ordered a full report within ten days on how the document was leaked, while presidential secretariat head Vera Ulianchenko initiated an internal investigation of Kozachok’s employment record (Ukrayinska Pravda, December 28).
The secret agreement aims to ensure “political stability and economic development” and to end years of political in-fighting. Both sides agreed compromises based upon avoiding raising issues that are considered divisive within Ukrainian society. Yushchenko agreed not to raise rehabilitating and promoting nationalist leaders or demanding compulsory Ukrainian language tests in schools and universities. In return, Yanukovych would not advocate Russian as a second state language or call for a referendum on Ukrainian NATO membership (UNIAN, December 25). Yanukovych has downplayed his election program commitment to Russian as a state language and Yushchenko has not mentioned NATO in his program.
The next section of the secret agreement calls for Yushchenko and Yanukovych not to criticize each other. The 2010 election campaign is noticeable for the absence of criticism by Yushchenko of Yanukovych and the former’s daily accusations against Tymoshenko. Yushchenko has asked voters to stay at home and not vote in round two, arguing there is no difference between Tymoshenko and Yanukovych who will inevitably enter the February 7 run off. A low turn-out in “Orange Ukraine” would result in Yanukovych’s election, while a large voter turn-out would ensure Tymoshenko’s election since the combined “Orange” vote is larger. Yushchenko is in effect calling on his supporters to not vote negatively against Yanukovych in the second round.
Playing on Western Ukrainian, anti-Russian nationalism, Yushchenko has accused Tymoshenko of being “unpatriotic” by referring to the fact that she has only one ethnic Ukrainian parent (her Armenian father separated from her mother when she was a child). In addition, since the summer of 2008 Yushchenko has repeatedly condemned as “treasonous” Tymoshenko’s cultivation of a pragmatic economic-energy relationship with Russia that has brought her support from Western Europeans anxious to avoid another gas crisis in January. Yushchenko has appealed to Ukrainians to vote for a “Ukrainian premier” (meaning himself) who will not, allegedly unlike Tymoshenko, sell Ukraine to Russia by permitting the Black Sea Fleet to remain in Sevastopol beyond 2017, which would require a constitutional amendment that no president could undertake (Ukrayinska Pravda, January 3). Tymoshenko would also allegedly transfer Ukraine’s gas pipelines to Russia, an accusation which contradicts Tymoshenko’s mobilization of parliament in February 2007 to vote for a law banning any transfer of the pipelines from Ukrainian state control and her March 2009 agreement with the EU to modernize the pipeline infrastructure without Russian involvement.
Tymoshenko is also accused of being the “biggest threat to democracy” in Ukraine, Yushchenko has claimed (Ukrayinska Pravda, December 24). This accusation ignores the perilous state of Ukrainian democracy, as shown by recent Western and Ukrainian surveys, which reveal that Ukrainians associate democracy with “chaos” following years of instability and elite in-fighting.
The “Coalition of Political Reconciliation and Development of Ukraine” would propose Yushchenko as its candidate for prime minister. The basis of this coalition remains unexplained, since Yushchenko controls only 15 out of 72 Our Ukraine deputies.
Yushchenko has always wavered between supporting a grand coalition with the Party of Regions or a “democratic” coalition with the Tymoshenko bloc (BYuT). Following the March 2006 elections Yushchenko sent the Prime Minister (and head of Our Ukraine) Yuriy Yekhanurov to negotiate a grand coalition and Roman Besmertnyi to form a “democratic” coalition. Following the dissolution of parliament in April 2007, Yushchenko negotiated a compromise with the Party of Regions to hold pre-term elections in September in exchange for a grand coalition. During the 2007 election campaign Yushchenko campaigned for a “democratic” coalition, which was established with Tymoshenko as its candidate for prime minister in December 2007. Raisa Bohatyriova, the head of the Party of Regions parliamentary faction, was appointed as secretary of the National Security and Defense Council (NRBO) who, together with the presidential secretariat head Viktor Baloga, spent 2008 seeking to undermine the Tymoshenko government in which Yushchenko had demanded that half the cabinet posts go to Our Ukraine.
The agreement seeks a grand coalition through a Yanukovych presidency, but will again fail for the same reasons that it has in the past. Yushchenko will be unable to ensure that a parliamentary majority will vote for him: Our Ukraine deputy Oleksandr Tretiakov said that parliament would never vote for Yushchenko’s candidacy (Ukrayinska Pravda, December 15). Tymoshenko would therefore remain a constitutionally powerful prime minister under President Yanukovych.
3 Responses to “Yushchenko-Yanukovych Alliance”
Yushchenko’s alliance with Yanukovych does worry me. It gives rise to serious concern. The only good thing about this current presidential circus parade is the removal of Yushchenko from office. He has been ineffective, divisive and overall destructive. His polices and actions have undermined Ukraine’s economic and democratic development.
Given that Yanukovych will most certainly be elected Ukraine’s next head of state on Sunday, thanks in a large part to Tymoshenko’s constant negative approach, the thought that Yushchenko will still wield some influence does not instill confidence in Yanukovych either.
If Fresh parliamentary election were held last month Tigipko would have held the balance of power and would have been in a strong position to form an alliance and governing coalition with Party of Regions. support form Yushchenko’s Our Ukraine will not be required.
IN the back of my mind I was hoping that maybe negotiations between Tymoshenko and Party of Regions would be rekindled and that some positive changes emerge as a result. This were looking positive back in June before Yushchenko again sought to derail the process.
Now I am not so sure. Tymoshenko will continue to hold some power and control and can still be crucial to determining the extent and direction of constitutional reform but she will not be coming form a position of strength and may not have too much say in what should be in and what should be out.
We can only hope and pray that Yanukocysh will be positive and fair., That he will place Ukraine;’s best interest ahead of his own personal pursuit for power. That he will continue to pursue a independent democratic policy of constitutional reform and that he will reject Yushchenko’s proposals outright.
By UkrToday on Feb 4, 2010
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!
“We can only hope and pray that Yanukovych will be positive and fair.”
Run away, and hold on to your wallet, because noone knows what that means, except maybe Paul Manafort and the American advisers who teach Yanukovych and Hissing Hanna Herman to spout nonsense platitudes like that.
Yanuk is the product of a sovok political machine, propped up by silly Donbass and its mafia oligarchs.
He will be fair to silly Donbass and the oligarchs who have fed at the government trough.
Yanukovych 1) refused to debate Tymoshenko 2) stole a 400-acre estate from the government called Mezhihirya 3) aided Akhmetov in stealing drilling rights on the Black Sea Shelf through a British Virgin Island company called Vanco Prykerchenska 4) participated in vote fraud in the 2004 elections.
The list goes on.
His son sits in Parliament for no apparent reason other than he is Yanuk’s son – cronyism and nepotism, anyone?
His Party of Regions physically blocked Parliament for over a year, playing rugby instead of participating in constructive sessions.
You are either delusional or sadly misinformed.
Yanuk is a Donbass thug who answers only to the oligarchs in the Party of Regions, for the sake of his own pocket and those of his cronies.
Why on earth would you expect this zebra to change his stripes now?
You really don’t know what you’re talking about.
By elmer on Feb 4, 2010