<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yushchenko i Litvinenko</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.taraskuzio.net/2008/07/13/yushchenko-i-litvinenko/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.taraskuzio.net/2008/07/13/yushchenko-i-litvinenko/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 21:51:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://blog.taraskuzio.net/2008/07/13/yushchenko-i-litvinenko/comment-page-1/#comment-18683</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taraskuzio.net/2008/07/13/yushchenko-i-litvinenko/#comment-18683</guid>
		<description>Yushchenko sees his place in history as a struggle for democracy against the corrupt and autocratic Kuchma regime.  The myth of a martyr  - including a heroic recovery from a near-fatal poisoning – is crucial to the preservation of that myth. Hence, the best possible outcome for him would have been to pin the assassination attempt on Kuchma’s secret service – the SBU.  After all, didn’t his wife attest to the “fact” that she tasted a metallic substance on his lips after he returned from his dinner with the head and deputy head of the SBU?

The only problem with this scenario is that – after four intensive years of investigation by officials appointed by him – they could not find a scrap of evidence linking Kuchma’s administration or the SBU to the poisoning. Instead, Yushchenko  occupied himself with the harassment and isolation of one of the few truly bright lights of post-independence Ukraine: Gen. Ihor Shmeshko, former defense attaché in Washington and head of both military intelligence and the SBU in the Kuchma administration. 

As had already been reported by several Western intelligence sources, Ihor Smeshko was the true hero of the “Orange Revolution”.  He openly opposed Yanukovich’s efforts to disperse the crowds by force and he threatened that SBU Special Forces would intervene and defend the protesters if military forces (then moving on Kyiv) entered the city.  It was Smeshko’s SBU that prevented the bombing attack on Yushchenko’s campaign headquarters by two Russian assassins.

Instead of rewarding Smeshko for his courage, professionalism and integrity, Yushchenko, after taking office, has tried to preserve the myth of SBU (and, by extension, Kuchma)  complicity in his poisoning.  But without any evidence he finds himself in the embarrassing position of  explaining away the length of the investigation. The most probable perpetrators are Russian officials working closely with one or two of their agents close to Yushchenko.  But to identify members of his own inner group without being able to establish a Russian connection would seriously erode the myth he has spun for himself both domestically and internationally.  Yushchenko knows that – short of a smoking gun – any evidence he produces of Russian complicity will be met with a wall of denial, ridicule, and vituperation on the Russian side.

So the “investigation” grinds on until he leaves office.  By that time  all parties will have agreed that the case had become “cold” and his poisoning would become simply another in a series of high-visibility political “unsolved mysteries”. But, without prosecution and trial, the real tragedy of this political theatre is that one of Ukraine’s most talented, honest and patriotic public officials, Ihor Smeshko, will be forced to live out his life under a cloud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yushchenko sees his place in history as a struggle for democracy against the corrupt and autocratic Kuchma regime.  The myth of a martyr  &#8211; including a heroic recovery from a near-fatal poisoning – is crucial to the preservation of that myth. Hence, the best possible outcome for him would have been to pin the assassination attempt on Kuchma’s secret service – the SBU.  After all, didn’t his wife attest to the “fact” that she tasted a metallic substance on his lips after he returned from his dinner with the head and deputy head of the SBU?</p>
<p>The only problem with this scenario is that – after four intensive years of investigation by officials appointed by him – they could not find a scrap of evidence linking Kuchma’s administration or the SBU to the poisoning. Instead, Yushchenko  occupied himself with the harassment and isolation of one of the few truly bright lights of post-independence Ukraine: Gen. Ihor Shmeshko, former defense attaché in Washington and head of both military intelligence and the SBU in the Kuchma administration. </p>
<p>As had already been reported by several Western intelligence sources, Ihor Smeshko was the true hero of the “Orange Revolution”.  He openly opposed Yanukovich’s efforts to disperse the crowds by force and he threatened that SBU Special Forces would intervene and defend the protesters if military forces (then moving on Kyiv) entered the city.  It was Smeshko’s SBU that prevented the bombing attack on Yushchenko’s campaign headquarters by two Russian assassins.</p>
<p>Instead of rewarding Smeshko for his courage, professionalism and integrity, Yushchenko, after taking office, has tried to preserve the myth of SBU (and, by extension, Kuchma)  complicity in his poisoning.  But without any evidence he finds himself in the embarrassing position of  explaining away the length of the investigation. The most probable perpetrators are Russian officials working closely with one or two of their agents close to Yushchenko.  But to identify members of his own inner group without being able to establish a Russian connection would seriously erode the myth he has spun for himself both domestically and internationally.  Yushchenko knows that – short of a smoking gun – any evidence he produces of Russian complicity will be met with a wall of denial, ridicule, and vituperation on the Russian side.</p>
<p>So the “investigation” grinds on until he leaves office.  By that time  all parties will have agreed that the case had become “cold” and his poisoning would become simply another in a series of high-visibility political “unsolved mysteries”. But, without prosecution and trial, the real tragedy of this political theatre is that one of Ukraine’s most talented, honest and patriotic public officials, Ihor Smeshko, will be forced to live out his life under a cloud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://blog.taraskuzio.net/2008/07/13/yushchenko-i-litvinenko/comment-page-1/#comment-18678</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taraskuzio.net/2008/07/13/yushchenko-i-litvinenko/#comment-18678</guid>
		<description>What could half way between the two versions possibly mean? Either he was poisoned or he wasn&#039;t. Or you mean there was only half the amount of dioxin. Zhavania&#039;s saying he wasn&#039;t poionsed at all, anywhere and unfortunately the truth is probably all on his side. The western journalists were, with their usual abibility for checking their sources and information were ataken for a ride. Also someone who&#039;s pushing to get their country into NATO and announced the black sea fleet should go in 1917 isn&#039;t much worried about offending Russia. It&#039;s Tym who&#039;s completely flexible about Russia - cheaper gas and no NATO and keep the base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What could half way between the two versions possibly mean? Either he was poisoned or he wasn&#8217;t. Or you mean there was only half the amount of dioxin. Zhavania&#8217;s saying he wasn&#8217;t poionsed at all, anywhere and unfortunately the truth is probably all on his side. The western journalists were, with their usual abibility for checking their sources and information were ataken for a ride. Also someone who&#8217;s pushing to get their country into NATO and announced the black sea fleet should go in 1917 isn&#8217;t much worried about offending Russia. It&#8217;s Tym who&#8217;s completely flexible about Russia &#8211; cheaper gas and no NATO and keep the base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
